We can't say anything concrete about how Andrew Bartlett voted on increasing the Youth Allowance rate
How Andrew Bartlett voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase the Youth Allowance rate to ensure that it covers basic living costs
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing the Youth Allowance rate” which Andrew Bartlett could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Andrew Bartlett on this policy.
| Division | Andrew Bartlett | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing the Youth Allowance rate” which Andrew Bartlett could have attended.
| Division | Andrew Bartlett | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
20th Jun 2018, 11:40 AM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Personal Income Tax Plan) Bill 2018 - Second Reading - Raise minimum wage, Newstart and Youth Allowance |
absent | Yes |
10th May 2018, 12:10 PM – Senate Motions - Pensions and Benefits - Increase single rate of Newstart and Youth Allowance |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Andrew Bartlett has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.