Compare how Trish Crossin and David Feeney voted on temporary protection visas
Trish Crossin
Former Australian Labor Party Senator for NT June 1998 – September 2013
David Feeney
Former Australian Labor Party Representative for Batman September 2013 – February 2018
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the Federal government should introduce temporary protection visas
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for temporary protection visas” which either Trish Crossin or David Feeney could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Trish Crossin and David Feeney on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Trish Crossin | David Feeney | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
4th Dec 2014 – Representatives Migration and Maritime Powers Legislation Amendment (Resolving the Asylum Legacy Caseload) Bill 2014 - Consideration of Senate Message - Agree with Senate's amendments |
- | No | Yes |
22nd Oct 2014, 5:12 PM – Representatives Migration and Maritime Powers Legislation Amendment (Resolving the Asylum Legacy Caseload) Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
- | No | Yes |
27th Jun 2013, 11:59 AM – Senate Migration Amendment (Reinstatement of Temporary Protection Visas) Bill 2013 [No. 2] - Second Reading - Read a second time |
No | No | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for temporary protection visas” which either Trish Crossin or David Feeney could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Trish Crossin | David Feeney | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
12th Sep 2012, 11:40 AM – Senate Motions — Republic of Nauru - Coalition policies |
No | No | Yes |
16th Aug 2012, 5:17 PM – Senate Migration Legislation Amendment (Regional Processing and Other Measures) Bill 2012 - Second Reading - Coalition policies (b) |
No | No | Yes |