We can't say anything concrete about how Sam McMahon voted on stopping tax avoidance or aggressive tax minimisation
How Sam McMahon voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should make it harder for individuals and corporations to avoid or aggressively minimise their Australian tax obligations and take part in international efforts to keep track of these individuals and corporations by sharing income and asset information
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for stopping tax avoidance or aggressive tax minimisation” which Sam McMahon could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sam McMahon on this policy.
| Division | Sam McMahon | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
9th Aug 2021, 8:45 PM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 1) Bill 2021 - in Committee - Get rid of exemption to scrutiny |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for stopping tax avoidance or aggressive tax minimisation” which Sam McMahon could have attended.
| Division | Sam McMahon | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
17th Jun 2020, 6:28 PM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (2020 Measures No. 2) Bill 2020 - Consideration of House of Representatives Message - Do not insist on amendments |
absent | No |
17th Jun 2020, 11:23 AM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (2020 Measures No. 2) Bill 2020 - in Committee - Exemptions for large proprietary companies |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Sam McMahon was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.