We can't say anything concrete about how Sam McMahon voted on stopping former ministers from taking lobbying positions within five years
How Sam McMahon voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should tighten the ministerial code of conduct to stop former ministers from taking up lobbying positions - including in-house positions - within five years of leaving Parliament
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for stopping former ministers from taking lobbying positions within five years” which Sam McMahon could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sam McMahon on this policy.
| Division | Sam McMahon | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for stopping former ministers from taking lobbying positions within five years” which Sam McMahon could have attended.
| Division | Sam McMahon | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
22nd Jul 2019, 3:55 PM – Senate Committees - Finance and Public Administration References Committee - Reference |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Sam McMahon has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.