We can't say anything concrete about how Nova Peris voted on funding the national school chaplaincy program
How Nova Peris voted compared to someone who agrees that The federal government should continue to fund the National School Chaplaincy Program (NSCP) to fund chaplains in Australian primary and secondary schools
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for funding the national school chaplaincy program” which Nova Peris could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nova Peris on this policy.
| Division | Nova Peris | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for funding the national school chaplaincy program” which Nova Peris could have attended.
| Division | Nova Peris | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
26th Jun 2014, 12:51 PM – Senate Motions - Youth Mental Health - Redirect chaplaincy funding to qualified mental health workers |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Nova Peris was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.