We can't say anything concrete about how Sandy Macdonald voted on increasing marine conservation
How Sandy Macdonald voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation and regulations that protect and conserve Australia's marine ecosystems such as the Great Barrier Reef
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing marine conservation” which Sandy Macdonald could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sandy Macdonald on this policy.
| Division | Sandy Macdonald | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing marine conservation” which Sandy Macdonald could have attended.
| Division | Sandy Macdonald | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
21st Jun 2007, 8:40 PM – Senate Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Amendment Bill 2007 - In Committee - extend boundaries of Park to EEZ |
No | Yes |
30th Mar 2006, 4:18 PM – Senate Motions - Great Barrier Reef Marine Park - Add to endangered list |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Sandy Macdonald has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.