We can't say anything concrete about how Sandy Macdonald voted on equal treatment for all couples
How Sandy Macdonald voted compared to someone who agrees that all couples should attract the same rights, entitlements and benefits under Australian law in both the public and private sector, whether they are de facto or married, heterosexual or homosexual
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for equal treatment for all couples” which Sandy Macdonald could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sandy Macdonald on this policy.
| Division | Sandy Macdonald | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
18th Sep 2007, 6:07 PM – Senate Tax Laws Amendment (2007 Measures No. 4) Bill 2007 and others - In Committee - Remove discrimination |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for equal treatment for all couples” which Sandy Macdonald could have attended.
| Division | Sandy Macdonald | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Sandy Macdonald was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.