We can't say anything concrete about how Ross Cadell voted on restricting donations to political parties
How Ross Cadell voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce restrictions to the amount and type of donations that political parties can receive in order to prevent corruption or the appearance of corruption in government
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for restricting donations to political parties” which Ross Cadell could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Ross Cadell on this policy.
| Division | Ross Cadell | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for restricting donations to political parties” which Ross Cadell could have attended.
| Division | Ross Cadell | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
6th Dec 2023, 7:28 PM – Senate Interactive Gambling Amendment (Credit and Other Measures) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Political influence of wagering industry |
absent | Yes |
4th Dec 2023, 12:21 PM – Senate Public Health (Tobacco and Other Products) Bill 2023 and another - Second Reading - Political donations |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Ross Cadell was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.