We can't say anything concrete about how Mark Arbib voted on increasing investment in renewable energy
How Mark Arbib voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase investment in renewable energy technologies
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing investment in renewable energy” which Mark Arbib could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Mark Arbib on this policy.
| Division | Mark Arbib | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing investment in renewable energy” which Mark Arbib could have attended.
| Division | Mark Arbib | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
8th Feb 2012, 4:30 PM – Senate Motions - Wind Farms - Act on the Community Affairs References Committee's recommendations |
absent | Yes |
22nd Jun 2010, 4:00 PM – Senate Motions - Transition to Renewable Energy - Undertake a study |
absent | Yes |
10th Sep 2009, 9:46 AM – Senate Motions - Solar Flagship Program - Support program |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Mark Arbib was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.