We can't say anything concrete about how Mark Arbib voted on banning all investment in cluster munitions
How Mark Arbib voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should ban both direct and indirect (e.g. through parent companies) investment in cluster munitions
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for banning all investment in cluster munitions” which Mark Arbib could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Mark Arbib on this policy.
Division | Mark Arbib | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for banning all investment in cluster munitions” which Mark Arbib could have attended.
Division | Mark Arbib | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
12th May 2011 – Senate Motions - Cluster Bombs - Extend prohibitions |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Mark Arbib was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.