How Marise Payne voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should allocate 0.7% of Gross National Income (GNI) to foreign aid in line with the United Nations' target

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing the foreign aid budget to 0.7% of Gross National Income” which Marise Payne could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Marise Payne on this policy.

Division Marise Payne Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing the foreign aid budget to 0.7% of Gross National Income” which Marise Payne could have attended.

Division Marise Payne Supporters vote

4th Dec 2019, 4:27 PM – Senate Motions - Budget: Foreign Aid - Increase

absent Yes

26th Nov 2018, 4:33 PM – Senate Motions - International Development Assistance - Increase aid budget

absent Yes

9th May 2017, 3:56 PM – Senate Motions - Military Unmanned Aerial Vehicles - Fund diplomatic network and aid

absent Yes

14th Mar 2013, 12:17 PM – Senate Motions - International Development Assistance - Increase foreign aid budget to 0.7% of GNI

absent Yes

25th Jun 2012, 3:42 PM – Senate Motions - Foreign Aid Budget - Increase foreign aid budget to 0.7% of GNI

absent Yes

14th Oct 2008, 3:59 PM – Senate Motions - Anti-Poverty Week - Base pension rate + foreign aid budget

No Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Marise Payne has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.