We can't say anything concrete about how Maria Kovacic voted on transgender rights
How Maria Kovacic voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should support the rights of transgender people (including genderfluid, nonbinary and genderqueer people) by amending laws and policies to support healthy lives by, for example, ensuring that appropriate healthcare is available nationwide and that trans people are protected from discrimination and harassment
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for transgender rights” which Maria Kovacic could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Maria Kovacic on this policy.
| Division | Maria Kovacic | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
12th Sep 2024, 11:58 AM – Senate Sex Discrimination Amendment (Acknowledging Biological Reality) Bill 2024 - First Reading - Introduce the bill into the Senate |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for transgender rights” which Maria Kovacic could have attended.
| Division | Maria Kovacic | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
28th Feb 2024, 4:01 PM – Senate Committees - Community Affairs Legislation Committee; Reference - Childhood Gender Transition Prohibition Bill 2023 |
absent | No |
16th Nov 2023, 11:44 AM – Senate Committees - Selection of Bills Committee; Report - Childhood Gender Transition Prohibition Bill 2023 |
absent | Yes |
3rd Aug 2023, 11:26 AM – Senate Committees - Community Affairs References Committee; Reference - Gender diverse children and young people |
No | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Maria Kovacic has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.