We can't say anything concrete about how Kerry Nettle voted on increasing fishing restrictions
How Kerry Nettle voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase fishing restrictions so that fish populations are sustainable
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing fishing restrictions” which Kerry Nettle could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kerry Nettle on this policy.
| Division | Kerry Nettle | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing fishing restrictions” which Kerry Nettle could have attended.
| Division | Kerry Nettle | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
19th Jun 2006, 3:43 PM – Senate Motions - Sea Bottom Trawl Fishing - Address destructive impact |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Kerry Nettle has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.