We can't say anything concrete about how Jenny McAllister voted on increasing parliamentary scrutiny of bills
How Jenny McAllister voted compared to someone who agrees that the parliament, particularly the Senate, should send bills to committees for inquiry to ensure that all bills are properly scrutinised before they pass through parliament to become law
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing parliamentary scrutiny of bills” which Jenny McAllister could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jenny McAllister on this policy.
| Division | Jenny McAllister | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing parliamentary scrutiny of bills” which Jenny McAllister could have attended.
| Division | Jenny McAllister | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
10th Feb 2022, 11:44 AM – Senate Committees - Selection of Bills Committee; Report - Inquire into two bills |
Yes | Yes |
10th Feb 2022, 11:31 AM – Senate Committees - Selection of Bills Committee; Report - Inquire into three electoral bills |
absent | Yes |
17th Jun 2021, 12:39 PM – Senate Committees - Selection of Bills Committee; Report - Ministerial Suitability Commission of Inquiry Bill 2021 |
absent | No |
17th Jun 2021, 12:36 PM – Senate Committees - Selection of Bills Committee; Report - Ministerial Suitability Commission of Inquiry Bill 2021 |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Jenny McAllister has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.