Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for targeting foreign interference in Australia” which Brian Burston could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Brian Burston on this policy.

Division	Brian Burston	Supporters vote
28th Jun 2018, 7:22 PM – Senate Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme Bill 2018 and another - Third Reading - Pass the bills	absent	Yes
28th Jun 2018, 10:21 AM – Senate National Security Legislation Amendment (Espionage and Foreign Interference) Bill 2018 and another - Second Reading - Agree with bills' main idea	absent	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for targeting foreign interference in Australia” which Brian Burston could have attended.

Division	Brian Burston	Supporters vote
15th Aug 2018, 4:01 PM – Senate Motions - Confucius Institute - Foreign influence	absent	Yes
28th Jun 2018, 6:20 PM – Senate National Security Legislation Amendment (Espionage and Foreign Interference) Bill 2018 - in Committee - Support the new offence of sabotage	absent	Yes
27th Jun 2018, 9:51 AM – Senate National Security Legislation Amendment (Espionage and Foreign Interference) Bill 2017 and another - First Reading - Consider bills together	absent	Yes
14th Jun 2017, 4:26 PM – Senate Motions - Influence of Foreign Agents - Royal Commission	Yes	Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Brian Burston has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.