We can't say anything concrete about how Bob Carr voted on temporary protection visas
How Bob Carr voted compared to someone who agrees that the Federal government should introduce temporary protection visas
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for temporary protection visas” which Bob Carr could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bob Carr on this policy.
Division | Bob Carr | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
27th Jun 2013, 11:59 AM – Senate Migration Amendment (Reinstatement of Temporary Protection Visas) Bill 2013 [No. 2] - Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for temporary protection visas” which Bob Carr could have attended.
Division | Bob Carr | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
12th Sep 2012, 11:40 AM – Senate Motions — Republic of Nauru - Coalition policies |
absent | Yes |
16th Aug 2012, 5:17 PM – Senate Migration Legislation Amendment (Regional Processing and Other Measures) Bill 2012 - Second Reading - Coalition policies (b) |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Bob Carr was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.