We can't say anything concrete about how Zed Seselja voted on the Murray Darling Basin Plan
How Zed Seselja voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should support the full delivery of the Murray Darling Basin Plan
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the Murray Darling Basin Plan” which Zed Seselja could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Zed Seselja on this policy.
| Division | Zed Seselja | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
23rd Jun 2021, 7:22 PM – Senate Water Legislation Amendment (Inspector-General of Water Compliance and Other Measures) Bill 2021 - in Committee - Nationals' amendments |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the Murray Darling Basin Plan” which Zed Seselja could have attended.
| Division | Zed Seselja | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
21st Jun 2021 – Senate Motions - Murray-Darling Basin - Support delivery of Plan |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Zed Seselja has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.