We can't say anything concrete about how Zed Seselja voted on paid parental leave equality for stay-at-home mums and dads
How Zed Seselja voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should ensure that paid parental leave provisions apply equally to both female and male primary care givers
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for paid parental leave equality for stay-at-home mums and dads” which Zed Seselja could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Zed Seselja on this policy.
| Division | Zed Seselja | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
11th Jun 2020, 12:01 PM – Senate Paid Parental Leave Amendment (Flexibility Measures) Bill 2020 - in Committee - Stay at home dads |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for paid parental leave equality for stay-at-home mums and dads” which Zed Seselja could have attended.
| Division | Zed Seselja | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Zed Seselja was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.