We can't say anything concrete about how Zed Seselja voted on prioritising religious freedom
How Zed Seselja voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should protect religious freedoms over other rights and freedoms (for example, by giving religious organisations the right to discriminate)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for prioritising religious freedom” which Zed Seselja could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Zed Seselja on this policy.
| Division | Zed Seselja | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for prioritising religious freedom” which Zed Seselja could have attended.
| Division | Zed Seselja | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
12th Nov 2018, 4:08 PM – Senate Motions - Day of the Unborn Child - Religious freedom |
absent | Yes |
16th Oct 2018, 4:15 PM – Senate Motions - Anti-Discrimination Laws - Protect students and staff at independent schools |
absent | No |
16th Oct 2018, 3:50 PM – Senate Motions - Religious Freedom Review - Discrimination against LGBTI students and staff |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Zed Seselja was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.