We can't say anything concrete about how Katy Gallagher voted on humane treatment of asylum seekers
How Katy Gallagher voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should ban offshore processing and not hold asylum seekers indefinitely
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for humane treatment of asylum seekers” which Katy Gallagher could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Katy Gallagher on this policy.
| Division | Katy Gallagher | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
6th Dec 2017, 4:13 PM – Senate Motions - Human Rights Day - Refugee resettlement and children |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for humane treatment of asylum seekers” which Katy Gallagher could have attended.
| Division | Katy Gallagher | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Katy Gallagher was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.