We can't say anything concrete about how Scott Buchholz voted on increasing transparency of ministers' use of governmental power
How Scott Buchholz voted compared to someone who agrees that there should be transparency surrounding how federal ministers use the powers given to them by legislation
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing transparency of ministers' use of governmental power” which Scott Buchholz could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Scott Buchholz on this policy.
| Division | Scott Buchholz | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing transparency of ministers' use of governmental power” which Scott Buchholz could have attended.
| Division | Scott Buchholz | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
7th Dec 2020, 5:07 PM – Representatives Foreign Investment Reform (Protecting Australia's National Security) Bill 2020 and another - Consideration in Detail - Transparency |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Scott Buchholz was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.