We can't say anything concrete about how Scott Buchholz voted on increasing the cost of humanities degrees
How Scott Buchholz voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should substantially increase the cost of humanities degrees at university (that is, degrees focussed on the study of human culture and society) in order to discourage students from enrolling in the the subject area and instead enrol in other subject areas, such as mathematics
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing the cost of humanities degrees” which Scott Buchholz could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Scott Buchholz on this policy.
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing the cost of humanities degrees” which Scott Buchholz could have attended.
| Division | Scott Buchholz | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
1st Sep 2020, 7:31 PM – Representatives Higher Education Support Amendment (Job-Ready Graduates and Supporting Regional and Remote Students) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Keep second reading motion unchanged |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Scott Buchholz was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.