Compare how Scott Buchholz and Anika Wells voted on banning pay secrecy clauses
Scott Buchholz
Liberal Party Representative for Wright since August 2010
Anika Wells
Australian Labor Party Representative for Lilley since May 2019
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should ban pay secrecy clauses so that employees can freely discuss and compare their pay with others
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for banning pay secrecy clauses” which either Scott Buchholz or Anika Wells could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Scott Buchholz and Anika Wells on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Scott Buchholz | Anika Wells | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
10th Nov 2022, 1:02 PM – Representatives Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Bill 2022 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
No | Yes | Yes |
10th Nov 2022, 12:59 PM – Representatives Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - Agree with the amended bill |
No | Yes | Yes |
10th Nov 2022, 9:31 AM – Representatives Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
No | Yes | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for banning pay secrecy clauses” which either Scott Buchholz or Anika Wells could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Scott Buchholz | Anika Wells | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
22nd Nov 2022, 4:25 PM – Representatives Business - Consideration of Legislation Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Bill 2022 |
No | absent | Yes |