We can't say anything concrete about how Peter Khalil voted on recognising the State of Palestine
How Peter Khalil voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should officially recognise the State of Palestine
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for recognising the State of Palestine” which Peter Khalil could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Peter Khalil on this policy.
| Division | Peter Khalil | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for recognising the State of Palestine” which Peter Khalil could have attended.
| Division | Peter Khalil | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
3rd Jul 2024, 5:58 PM – Representatives Motions - Middle East - Recognise State of Palestine |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Peter Khalil has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.