Compare how Peter Khalil and Ted O'Brien voted on treating the COVID vaccine rollout as a matter of urgency

Photo of Peter Khalil

Peter Khalil

Australian Labor Party Representative for Wills since July 2016

Voted consistently for treating the COVID vaccine rollout as a matter of urgency
Photo of Ted O'Brien

Ted O'Brien

Liberal Party Representative for Fairfax since July 2016

Voted consistently against treating the COVID vaccine rollout as a matter of urgency

How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should treat the COVID-19 vaccination as a matter of urgency and ensure that Australians are being vaccinated as fast as possible, starting with essential workers such as staff working in hospitals and aged care facilities

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for treating the COVID vaccine rollout as a matter of urgency” which either Peter Khalil or Ted O'Brien could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Peter Khalil and Ted O'Brien on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Peter Khalil Ted O'Brien Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for treating the COVID vaccine rollout as a matter of urgency” which either Peter Khalil or Ted O'Brien could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Peter Khalil Ted O'Brien Supporters vote

22nd Jun 2021, 6:52 PM – Representatives Covid-19 Disaster Payment (Funding Arrangements) Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Quarantine and vaccine program

No Yes No

17th Jun 2021, 11:27 AM – Representatives Social Services Legislation Amendment (Portability Extensions) Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Age pension and pensioners stranded overseas

No Yes No