We can't say anything concrete about how Llew O'Brien voted on increasing transparency of public appointments
How Llew O'Brien voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should ensure that public appointments are made through a transparent and independent process to address concerns about a "jobs for mates" culture in Australian politics
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing transparency of public appointments” which Llew O'Brien could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Llew O'Brien on this policy.
| Division | Llew O'Brien | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing transparency of public appointments” which Llew O'Brien could have attended.
| Division | Llew O'Brien | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
24th May 2023, 12:08 PM – Representatives Infrastructure Australia Amendment (Independent Review) Bill 2023 - Consideration in Detail - Appointments |
absent | No |
11th May 2023, 5:40 PM – Representatives Jobs and Skills Australia Amendment Bill 2023 - Consideration in Detail - Independent selection process |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Llew O'Brien was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.