We can't say anything concrete about how Tanya Plibersek voted on community right to say no to nuclear waste disposal sites
How Tanya Plibersek voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should be required to seek the consent of local communities before selecting new sites for radioactive waste disposal
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for community right to say no to nuclear waste disposal sites” which Tanya Plibersek could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Tanya Plibersek on this policy.
| Division | Tanya Plibersek | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for community right to say no to nuclear waste disposal sites” which Tanya Plibersek could have attended.
| Division | Tanya Plibersek | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
11th Jun 2020, 12:54 PM – Representatives National Radioactive Waste Management Amendment (Site Specification, Community Fund and Other Measures) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
No | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Tanya Plibersek has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.