Compare how Tanya Plibersek and Sarah Henderson voted on increasing penalties for breach of data

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing penalties for breach of data” which either Tanya Plibersek or Sarah Henderson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Tanya Plibersek and Sarah Henderson on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Tanya Plibersek	Sarah Henderson	Supporters vote
11th Oct 2016, 6:20 PM – Representatives National Cancer Screening Register Bill 2016 and another - Consideration in Detail - Penalties for data breach	Yes	No	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing penalties for breach of data” which either Tanya Plibersek or Sarah Henderson could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Tanya Plibersek	Sarah Henderson	Supporters vote
no votes listed