Compare how Tanya Plibersek and Paul Neville voted on compensating victims of overseas terrorism since the September 11 attack

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for compensating victims of overseas terrorism since the September 11 attack” which either Tanya Plibersek or Paul Neville could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Tanya Plibersek and Paul Neville on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Tanya Plibersek	Paul Neville	Supporters vote
21st Jun 2012, 2:42 PM – Representatives Social Security Amendment (Supporting Australian Victims of Terrorism Overseas) Bill 2011 - Consideration in Detail - Compensate past victims	No	Yes	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for compensating victims of overseas terrorism since the September 11 attack” which either Tanya Plibersek or Paul Neville could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Tanya Plibersek	Paul Neville	Supporters vote
29th Nov 2012, 6:29 PM – Representatives Private Members' Business - Victims of Terrorism - Compensate victims since 10 September 2001	No	Yes	Yes