Compare how James Stevens and Carina Garland voted on speeding things along in Parliament (procedural)
James Stevens
Liberal Party Representative for Sturt since May 2019
Carina Garland
Australian Labor Party Representative for Chisholm since May 2022
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that Members of Parliament (MPs) and Senators should vote to speed things along by supporting motions to 'put the question' (known as 'closure' or 'gag' motions), which require Parliament to immediately vote on a question rather than debating it any further
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for speeding things along in Parliament (procedural)” which either James Stevens or Carina Garland could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of James Stevens and Carina Garland on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for speeding things along in Parliament (procedural)” which either James Stevens or Carina Garland could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | James Stevens | Carina Garland | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||