Compare how Michael Keenan and John Murphy voted on recognising local government in the Constitution

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for recognising local government in the Constitution” which either Michael Keenan or John Murphy could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Michael Keenan and John Murphy on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Michael Keenan	John Murphy	Supporters vote
5th Jun 2013, 7:04 PM – Representatives Constitution Alteration (Local Government) 2013 - Third Reading - Pass the bill	Yes	Yes	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for recognising local government in the Constitution” which either Michael Keenan or John Murphy could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Michael Keenan	John Murphy	Supporters vote
no votes listed