Compare how Matt Burnell and Anika Wells voted on compulsory income management for welfare recipients

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for compulsory income management for welfare recipients” which either Matt Burnell or Anika Wells could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Matt Burnell and Anika Wells on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Matt Burnell	Anika Wells	Supporters vote
28th Mar 2023, 6:00 PM – Representatives Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Income Management Reform) Bill 2023 - Consideration in Detail - No compulsory income management	Yes	Yes	Yes
28th Mar 2023, 5:34 PM – Representatives Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Income Management Reform) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea	Yes	Yes	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for compulsory income management for welfare recipients” which either Matt Burnell or Anika Wells could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Matt Burnell	Anika Wells	Supporters vote
no votes listed