Compare how Pat Conroy and Daniel Mulino voted on a character test for Australian visas

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a character test for Australian visas” which either Pat Conroy or Daniel Mulino could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Pat Conroy and Daniel Mulino on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Pat Conroy Daniel Mulino Supporters vote

13th Feb 2023, 4:41 PM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Aggregate Sentences) Bill 2023 - Consideration in Detail - Agree with the bill

absent Yes Yes

18th Sep 2019, 7:30 PM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Strengthening the Character Test) Bill 2019 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea

No No Yes

18th Sep 2019, 7:24 PM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Strengthening the Character Test) Bill 2019 - Second Reading - Refuse a second reading

Yes Yes No

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a character test for Australian visas” which either Pat Conroy or Daniel Mulino could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Pat Conroy Daniel Mulino Supporters vote
no votes listed