We can't say anything concrete about how Harry Jenkins voted on a minerals resource rent tax
How Harry Jenkins voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should put a tax on profits earned from mining mineral resources such as coal and iron ore
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a minerals resource rent tax ” which Harry Jenkins could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Harry Jenkins on this policy.
Division | Harry Jenkins | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
22nd Nov 2011 – Representatives Minerals Resource Rent Tax Bill 2011 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
22nd Nov 2011 – Representatives Minerals Resource Rent Tax Bill 2011 - Consideration in Detail - Agree to the bill |
absent | Yes |
22nd Nov 2011 – Representatives Minerals Resource Rent Tax Bill 2011 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a minerals resource rent tax ” which Harry Jenkins could have attended.
Division | Harry Jenkins | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
22nd Nov 2011 – Representatives Minerals Resource Rent Tax Bill 2011 - Consideration in Detail - Magnetite exclusion |
absent | No |
22nd Nov 2011 – Representatives Minerals Resource Rent Tax Bill 2011 - Consideration in Detail - Industry pays when mature miner pays |
absent | No |
3rd Nov 2011 – Representatives Minerals Resource Rent Tax Bill 2011 and related bills - Second Reading - Adjourn debate |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Harry Jenkins was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.