We can't say anything concrete about how Michael Johnson voted on government administered paid parental leave
How Michael Johnson voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should administer the paid parental leave scheme rather than employers
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for government administered paid parental leave” which Michael Johnson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Michael Johnson on this policy.
| Division | Michael Johnson | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for government administered paid parental leave” which Michael Johnson could have attended.
| Division | Michael Johnson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
31st May 2010, 8:32 PM – Representatives Paid Parental Leave Bill 2010, Paid Parental Leave (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2010 - Second Reading - Coalition amendments |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Michael Johnson was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.