We can't say anything concrete about how Elizabeth Watson-Brown voted on increasing the cost of humanities degrees
How Elizabeth Watson-Brown voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should substantially increase the cost of humanities degrees at university (that is, degrees focussed on the study of human culture and society) in order to discourage students from enrolling in the the subject area and instead enrol in other subject areas, such as mathematics
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing the cost of humanities degrees” which Elizabeth Watson-Brown could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Elizabeth Watson-Brown on this policy.
| Division | Elizabeth Watson-Brown | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing the cost of humanities degrees” which Elizabeth Watson-Brown could have attended.
| Division | Elizabeth Watson-Brown | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
10th Oct 2024, 9:05 AM – Representatives Universities Accord (Student Support and Other Measures) Bill 2024 - Consideration in Detail - Maximum student contribution amounts for places and HELP indexation |
Yes | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Elizabeth Watson-Brown has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.