We can't say anything concrete about how Kay Hull voted on increasing the diversity of media ownership
How Kay Hull voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should use regulation to increase the diversity of publishers and broadcasters in Australia's media industry by, for example, setting a threshold for the maximum market share of any one company.
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing the diversity of media ownership” which Kay Hull could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kay Hull on this policy.
| Division | Kay Hull | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
18th Oct 2006, 12:09 PM – Representatives Broadcasting Services Amendment (Media Ownership) Bill 2006 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | No |
18th Oct 2006, 12:02 PM – Representatives Broadcasting Services Amendment (Media Ownership) Bill 2006 - Consideration in Detail - Remove new cross-media ownership laws from bill |
absent | Yes |
18th Oct 2006, 11:21 AM – Representatives Broadcasting Services Amendment (Media Ownership) Bill 2006 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing the diversity of media ownership” which Kay Hull could have attended.
| Division | Kay Hull | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Kay Hull was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.