We can't say anything concrete about how Jim Chalmers voted on recognising the State of Palestine
How Jim Chalmers voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should officially recognise the State of Palestine
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for recognising the State of Palestine” which Jim Chalmers could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jim Chalmers on this policy.
| Division | Jim Chalmers | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for recognising the State of Palestine” which Jim Chalmers could have attended.
| Division | Jim Chalmers | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
3rd Jul 2024, 5:58 PM – Representatives Motions - Middle East - Recognise State of Palestine |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Jim Chalmers was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.