Compare how Jim Chalmers and Warren Entsch voted on decreasing availability of welfare payments
Jim Chalmers
Australian Labor Party Representative for Rankin since September 2013
Warren Entsch
Liberal Party Representative for Leichhardt since August 2010
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should limit the availability of government social security payments
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for decreasing availability of welfare payments” which either Jim Chalmers or Warren Entsch could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jim Chalmers and Warren Entsch on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for decreasing availability of welfare payments” which either Jim Chalmers or Warren Entsch could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".