Compare how Meryl Swanson and Vince Connelly voted on considering legislation to create a federal anti-corruption commission (procedural)
Meryl Swanson
Australian Labor Party Representative for Paterson since July 2016
Vince Connelly
Former Liberal Party Representative for Stirling May 2019 – May 2022
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the parliament should immediately introduce and debate legislation to create a federal anti-corruption commission, or national integrity commission, that would detect, investigate and prevent corruption at a federal level (NB: this policy is related to our other policy, called "For creating a federal Anti-Corruption Commission")
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for considering legislation to create a federal anti-corruption commission (procedural)” which either Meryl Swanson or Vince Connelly could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Meryl Swanson and Vince Connelly on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Meryl Swanson | Vince Connelly | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for considering legislation to create a federal anti-corruption commission (procedural)” which either Meryl Swanson or Vince Connelly could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Meryl Swanson | Vince Connelly | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
25th Nov 2021, 11:37 AM – Representatives Business - Rearrangement - Let a vote on the integrity commission take place |
Yes | absent | Yes |
20th Oct 2021, 5:36 PM – Representatives Motions - Commonwealth Integrity Commission - Don't let a vote happen |
No | Yes | No |
11th Jun 2020, 9:46 AM – Representatives Business - Consideration of Legislation - Don't let a vote happen |
No | absent | No |
10th Sep 2019, 6:16 PM – Representatives National Integrity Commission Bill 2018 (No. 2) - First Reading - Consider second reading tomorrow |
No | Yes | No |