Compare how Meryl Swanson and Paul Fletcher voted on banning mobiles and other devices in immigration detention

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for banning mobiles and other devices in immigration detention” which either Meryl Swanson or Paul Fletcher could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Meryl Swanson and Paul Fletcher on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Meryl Swanson	Paul Fletcher	Supporters vote
2nd Sep 2020, 5:07 PM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Prohibiting Items in Immigration Detention Facilities) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea	No	Yes	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for banning mobiles and other devices in immigration detention” which either Meryl Swanson or Paul Fletcher could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Meryl Swanson	Paul Fletcher	Supporters vote
no votes listed