We can't say anything concrete about how Pauline Hanson voted on making price gauging illegal
How Pauline Hanson voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce laws to prohibit corporations from engaging in conduct that is likely to result in excessive prices for goods and services for consumers
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for making price gauging illegal” which Pauline Hanson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Pauline Hanson on this policy.
| Division | Pauline Hanson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
9th Oct 2024, 10:42 AM – Senate Competition and Consumer Amendment (Make Price Gouging Illegal) Bill 2024 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for making price gauging illegal” which Pauline Hanson could have attended.
| Division | Pauline Hanson | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Pauline Hanson was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.