Compare how Trent Zimmerman and Clare O'Neil voted on the Coalition's new schools funding policy ("Gonski 2.0")

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the Coalition's new schools funding policy ("Gonski 2.0")” which either Trent Zimmerman or Clare O'Neil could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Trent Zimmerman and Clare O'Neil on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Trent Zimmerman	Clare O'Neil	Supporters vote
29th May 2017, 7:09 PM – Representatives Australian Education Amendment Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea	Yes	No	Yes
29th May 2017, 7:02 PM – Representatives Australian Education Amendment Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Don't agree with bill's main idea	No	Yes	No

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the Coalition's new schools funding policy ("Gonski 2.0")” which either Trent Zimmerman or Clare O'Neil could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Trent Zimmerman	Clare O'Neil	Supporters vote
no votes listed