We can't say anything concrete about how Joe Hockey voted on an emissions reduction fund
How Joe Hockey voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce an emissions reduction fund so it can buy domestic greenhouse gas emissions reductions and offsets by reverse auction. This is a key part of the Coalition Government's Direct Action policy.
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for an emissions reduction fund” which Joe Hockey could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Joe Hockey on this policy.
| Division | Joe Hockey | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
25th Jun 2014, 6:54 PM – Representatives Carbon Farming Initiative Amendment Bill 2014 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
25th Jun 2014, 6:48 PM – Representatives Carbon Farming Initiative Amendment Bill 2014 — Second Reading — Read a second time |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for an emissions reduction fund” which Joe Hockey could have attended.
| Division | Joe Hockey | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
25th Jun 2014, 6:45 PM – Representatives Carbon Farming Initiative Amendment Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Criticise the Government's climate change policies |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Joe Hockey was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.