We can't say anything concrete about how Sam Birrell voted on making the cashless debit card program voluntary and not mandatory
How Sam Birrell voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should make the cashless debit card program (a program where welfare payments are put onto controlled debit cards, also known as Indue cards, for restricted use) voluntary so that people are not forced to participate in it
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for making the cashless debit card program voluntary and not mandatory” which Sam Birrell could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sam Birrell on this policy.
| Division | Sam Birrell | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for making the cashless debit card program voluntary and not mandatory” which Sam Birrell could have attended.
| Division | Sam Birrell | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
28th Mar 2023, 5:20 PM – Representatives Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Income Management Reform) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Against compulsory income management |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Sam Birrell has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.