We can't say anything concrete about how Sharon Claydon voted on intersex rights
How Sharon Claydon voted compared to someone who agrees that intersex people must have equal rights, protection from discrimination, vilification, defamation, human rights abuses and other forms of mistreatment
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for intersex rights” which Sharon Claydon could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sharon Claydon on this policy.
| Division | Sharon Claydon | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for intersex rights” which Sharon Claydon could have attended.
| Division | Sharon Claydon | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
7th Nov 2022, 4:05 PM – Representatives Anti-Discrimination and Human Rights Legislation Amendment (Respect at Work) Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - Extending protection |
Yes | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Sharon Claydon has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.