We can't say anything concrete about how Barnaby Joyce voted on Copyright reforms
How Barnaby Joyce voted compared to someone who agrees that Copyright laws in Australia requires reforms to modernise the Copyright Act, as recommended by the The Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC). Australia should broaden the existing 'fair dealing' exceptions to a much broader, flexible 'fair use' exception, in line with US copyright law.
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for Copyright reforms” which Barnaby Joyce could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Barnaby Joyce on this policy.
| Division | Barnaby Joyce | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for Copyright reforms” which Barnaby Joyce could have attended.
| Division | Barnaby Joyce | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
30th Nov 2006, 11:00 PM – Senate Copyright Amendment Bill 2006 - In Committee - Technological protection measures + copyright infringement |
absent | Yes |
30th Nov 2006, 10:06 PM – Senate Copyright Amendment Bill 2006 - In Committee - Cap on licence fees |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Barnaby Joyce has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.