Compare how Ian Goodenough and Dan Tehan voted on a Royal Commission into Violence and Abuse against People with Disability
Ian Goodenough
Liberal Party Representative for Moore since September 2013
Dan Tehan
Liberal Party Representative for Wannon since August 2010
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should establish a Royal Commission to investigate and report on violence and abuse against people with disability in light of the the disproportionately high number of reports of abuse of Australians with a disability by people who are meant to care for them
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a Royal Commission into Violence and Abuse against People with Disability” which either Ian Goodenough or Dan Tehan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Ian Goodenough and Dan Tehan on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Ian Goodenough | Dan Tehan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
21st Jun 2017, 5:35 PM – Representatives National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Quality and Safeguards Commission and Other Measures) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Royal Commission into Violence and Abuse against People with Disability |
No | No | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a Royal Commission into Violence and Abuse against People with Disability” which either Ian Goodenough or Dan Tehan could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Ian Goodenough | Dan Tehan | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||