We can't say anything concrete about how Angie Bell voted on net zero emissions by 2035
How Angie Bell voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should commit to achieving net zero emissions by 2035 as part of Australia's efforts to address climate change
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for net zero emissions by 2035” which Angie Bell could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Angie Bell on this policy.
| Division | Angie Bell | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
4th Aug 2022, 11:25 AM – Representatives Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - More ambitious targets |
absent | No |
4th Aug 2022, 11:03 AM – Representatives Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - More ambitious targets needed |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for net zero emissions by 2035” which Angie Bell could have attended.
| Division | Angie Bell | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Angie Bell was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.