We can't say anything concrete about how Angie Bell voted on limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees
How Angie Bell voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should commit to a target of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees celsius above pre-industrial levels
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees ” which Angie Bell could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Angie Bell on this policy.
| Division | Angie Bell | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
9th Sep 2024, 12:32 PM – Representatives Future Made in Australia Bill 2024 - Consideration in Detail - Decarbonisation |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees ” which Angie Bell could have attended.
| Division | Angie Bell | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
4th Jun 2024, 5:56 PM – Representatives Net Zero Economy Authority Bill 2024 - Consideration in Detail - Increase scope of bill |
absent | Yes |
4th Aug 2022, 12:24 PM – Representatives Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - Article 2 of the Paris Agreement |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Angie Bell has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.